Mary Ford not born in NZ

Birth updates from New Zealand.

I had thought Mary Ford, born to James and Elizabeth, was born in Australia but had not found any record of such birth.  Searching around I found a ‘Mary Ford’ born in Wellington NZ the date of which dovetails neatly with the births of Janet Muir Ford and Margaret Ford.  I sent for the archive records and can now confirm that this ‘Mary Ford’ is not related the James and Elizabeth Ford.

On the other hand, the records from NZ reveal that Janet Muir Ford, who is recorded on Robert Muir Ford’s Australian birth certificate as being born in Wellington was in fact born in Dunedin which is not far from Waikouaiti where James and Elizabeth were married.  Margaret Ford was born in Wellington NZ.  You can find the details here.

Some correction

Researching family history is challenging.  Certainly, it is rewarding but other times can be frustrating and then at other times downright embarrassing.

I find I have made a huge error.  Backtracking through my records I realised things did not add up.  Collecting birth dates for the family of James and Elizabeth Ford I ‘suddenly’ found I had three of their offspring born in Wellington, not two.  I checked, and indeed James and Elizabeth raised three daughters in Wellington, New Zealand.  Janet Muir Ford (1865), Mary Ford (1866), and Margaret Ford (1867).  And here I was all the time thinking only two daughters were born in NZ.  How could I have made such an error?

I made the error because the birth certificate of Robert Muir Ford, James and Elizabeth’s fourth child born in Ballarat, Australia, clearly indicates that only Janet and Margaret were siblings of the newly arrived Robert Muir Ford (see birth certificate below).  There is no mention of Mary.

It will also be noted that the said birth certificate indicates that James and Elizabeth were married in May 1854.  The correct date of their marriage is 11 May 1864.

On the other hand, how can I be sure that the James Ford born to Samuel and Margaret Ford in Millport, Scotland is the same James Ford who married Elizabeth Muir in Waikouaiti (Otago) in New Zealand?  Where is the continuity in the record?

There is a record in the 1851 census of Scotland of a James Ford, aged sixteen, living at Kilmarnock and working as a wright (carpenter).  Fortunately, the census record also includes his place of birth, Millport and his age, given the times, fits within an acceptable allowance of his recorded birth in Millport in the last week (27th) of December 1834.

How then to link the James Ford at Kilmarnock with the James Ford who married Elizabeth Muir in New Zealand?  For one thing, there is no record I can find of James Ford in the 1861 census.  He could be anywhere.  Unfortunately, the New Zealand marriage certificate is no help in assisting with continuity with the past.

But we can establish continuity with James Ford and Elizabeth through the Australian birth certificate for Robert Muir Ford, their son born in Ballarat.  Allowing for the errors in this particular certificate as noted above, here we find that Robert Muir Ford’s father, James Ford, aged 34, was a carpenter and born in Millport.  The recorded age is within acceptable limits.  It might be noted that Millport, which was in Buteshire at that time, is recorded as being in Ayrshire which perhaps more reflects local custom and acceptance.  For the record, Cumbrae became part of Ayrshire in 1975.

Robert Muir Ford’s Australian birth certificate. 

Elizabeth Muir is recorded as 24 years of age coming from Greenock, Scotland.  Her age confirms that she was, in fact, a ‘minor’ when she married, as recorded on the New Zealand marriage certificate.

This is clear continuity with James Ford born to Samuel and Margaret Ford in Millport in 1834.

To date, I have not discovered how James arrived in New Zealand.  Like his siblings who left Millport for the colonies, he probably paid for his ticket.  In a time before government bureaucracies were given the task of recording the day to day activities of their citizens unless someone at sometime has kept a record of fare-paying passengers arrivals there are no other means of establishing James’ arrival in New Zealand.  If he had come through as an ‘assisted passage’ there would be some government record.  I can find no such record.

Similarly, I can find no record of James sailing from New Zealand to Australia.  The next record we have of James is when his son Robert Muir Ford is born in Ballarat.


Copyright John Ford 2018.

Correct Spelling for ‘Cumbrae’

I had an email directing my attention to the spelling of ‘Cumbrae’ on the Chasing Samuel Ford page; A Statistical Account of the Isle of Cimbrae.  

The general consensus is that the correct spelling is ‘Cumbrae’, but there are many references to other spellings.  Below I have provided a further reference illustrating some of the spellings back in 1797.

Just to clarify, in relation to the particular spelling ‘Cimbrae,’ it should be noted that the reference indicates a particular title of an article, highlighted by italic text,  which can only be identified by the printed title as appearing on the work itself.  This is a technical area that is surrounded by copyright laws and offences concerning plagiarism.  However, if a spelling mistake appears in a quoted text from a referenced article the error can be corrected when contained within square brackets [sp.] indicating that the one is aware of the mistake.  A good example appears in the textual quote itself.

Where is Samuel Ford hiding?

It is frustrating, to say the least, that there appears no record of Samuel Ford’s parent or where he may have been born.  But is that the end of the matter?  Surely Not.  What can we glean from the record that might assist in tracking down the Illusive Samuel Ford?

I added some thoughts on the matter.  For my latest additions see Chasing Samuel Ford.